We are sure, there is not about what worrying

Ramón Lobo

The Dominican police managed on Thursday night (Friday dawn in Spain) a big success in the struggle against the international terrorism and nobody, so busy all of what he says, does, thinks, eats and descome Barack Obama, he has emphasized it. The Dominican police, with big risk and value, managed to intercept to me a dangerous bottle of Haitian rum Barbancourt of eight years (valued for approximately 20 euros) that there had given me Mat and Pascal, my driver and translator in Port-au-Prince. The agent proved to be firm, insensitive before my requests first and my threats after drinking it to me of a gulp, or several, which it is not necessary to exaggerate either. “There are the international norms”, he said. “The norms are absurd. How is it possible that it could not spend rum for this control and 10 meters further away be able to buy it and fly without risk for nobody. Does any logic see him?”, I affirmed more that to ask. She, with a big sense of the script, added:“ There are the international norms”. And it is already. End of the discussion if you do not want to extend your customs problems to other contents of the baggage.

More In the mouth of the wolf

----

(Ramón Lobo has just been a prizewinner with IX Award José Manuel Porquet of Digital Journalism. It is deserved).

A person: a vote?

A simple mathematical exercise, for all those who insist that the Spanish electoral system favors the nationalists. It is a simple account: to divide the number of votes of the last personal details by the number of obtained benches. And this way it is discovered, with a calculator and big stupor, that in Spain there is a party that a deputy takes as every 484.935 votes, and is called an Izquierda Unida. There is other that achieved 306.078 votes for only one delegated, and his name is UPyD. There are several nationalists of left whom it costs approximately hundred thousand votes every bench: Republican Esquerra of Catalunya and the Nationalistic Block Galego. There is a nationalistic party of rights that a deputy obtained for every 77.942 votes: Convergence and It Joined; and another, Canary Coalition, which achieved two benches to 87.314 votes each one. And there are two big parties, the kings of the chamber, for whom every bench has gone out for approximately 66.700 votes: Spanish socialist party and PP.

Only the PNV, to 51.021 votes for every bench, and Nafarroa Bai, to 62.398 votes, obtains deputies at better price. But if the vote in Spain was proportional, the nationalistic parties, in whole, two more deputies would obtain; IU-ICV would have 13 benches and not two; UPyD, 5. But Spanish socialist party and PP would lose between 8 and 9 benches each one.

Last week, the lideresa of UPyD, Rosa Díez, presented in the Congress a proposal not of law to ask the Government to reform the electoral law. For almost two years, there is employed at the Parliament a subcommittee that will present a reform proposal some day, or one waits for that; the contracting subcommittee of the first part does not seem to be in the hurry. It is not necessary to have a calculator to foresee for what every deputy voted: only IU and UPyD endorsed the motion. So that then they say that the consensus is impossible.

The deathblow one will give his Batasuna to ETA

Arsenio Escolar

January and February there have been the two worst months of the history of ETA. Because there have been detained 32 members of the terrorist band, one of them his maximum chief; because they have taken control of 2.000 kilos of explosives; because a base has been located to them in Portugal; because one has prevented from mounting a base in Catalonia … But also, and about this we have spoken little the mass media, because his political and social supports, the world of Batasuna, they have begun to move away from the terrorists.

More in That they give birth to the machines

Download NCIS Los Angeles S01E18 Blood Brothers free

Financial Times shakes Es …

Financial Times shakes Spain again (it punctures in the first result of the search to see the free article)

The crisis is federal

Financial Times has published another article about the Spanish economy where they say to the Government of less nice everything. The Bible of City Londinense transforms again in the vindictive god of the ancient testament and, after the flirtatious comments that he dedicated to the Shoemaker's Executive after the visit of Helen Salgado, it returns to the criticism. In only one month, Spain first was a potentially more serious “drama” than Greece; eight days later, we turn in a country “better Prepared than the United Kingdom” to confront the crisis; and now, three weeks later, we are a small country again of giving credit. “The markets prepare themselves to punish Spain”, it titled the Financial Times on Sunday in one of these dangerous predictions that are fulfilled alone.

In spite of everything, they have something of reason in London, where from they indicate three problems in the plan of austerity of the Government. The first one, that his economic forecasts are too optimistic. The second one, that most of the public expenditure is in hands of the autonomies and the town halls, not of the Government. The third one, that the Socialists lack the political will necessary to carry out it.

The points one and three are debatable, even more when those who put the finger on these ulcers are the same that nothing does they were praising both to the doctor and to his recipe. But the second problem is an obviousness that in Spain forgets constantly. We deceive ourselves with the name. But, beyond the euphemism of the "autonomies", the true thing is that we live in the federal state, where big part of the weapon to reactivate the economy – now when the central bank is in Fráncfort – has the autonomic governments. That's why the contest of the PP is so important against the crisis; that's why his position is so irresponsible.

Rajoy approaches the critic …

Rajoy approaches the critics of the PP. He ate with Aznar a few weeks ago and one speaks again with Carlos Aragonés. http://bit.ly/95KVb6

Fantastic compilation of c …

Fantastic compilation of advertizing campaigns for a good cause http://bit.ly/9pVYr9

The mood

On the following day of the victory of Obama, the sales of ammunition went off. Many people were afraid that the new president was prohibiting the weapon, as was saying FoxNews, although during the campaign it had not stopped repeating his infinite respect for the sacred right of the Americans to have an arsenal at home. The propaganda could more. “The left cannot simplify the messages so well like the right”, tells to me a leader of the Center for American Progress, a progressive think tank. It is a way of seeing it. Other one, which the left loses when it does not defend his ideas, when he resigns from his flags, when he ignores the lies instead of answering them.

The last example is in the sanitary reform of Obama, this probable corpse that a few days ago diseccionó the magazine Newsweek with a sharp survey. 60 % of the Americans supports the idea of creating a medical insurance for all, paid for the Government for the persons without resources; 76 % believes that it is necessary to force the insurers to give insurance policies also to those who have suffered an illness; 75 % endorses that the companies assure his workpeople. The details please separately, but his joint sale fails: when 40 % wonders the same interrogated persons what they think about the sanitary Obama reform only it is in favor, while 49 % pushes it back.

“The fault has Obama”, tells to me John Aravosis, author of the progressive AmericaBlog, who is much disappointed by his president. “It has not defended his reform opposite to the lies of the republicans. It is more pawned in there liked the whole world that in fulfilling his promises. Nothing more to sit down to negotiate, delivers half of the cake, and to another side it has to a party on that he does not want to agree and laughs at him”. I do not know why, the scene turned out to be familiar to me.

Isaac Rosa: Say something positive to me …

Isaac Rosa: Say a little positive of the unemployment to me, quickly http://bit.ly/9j0×8q

The Management one says that against …

The Management one says that the slavery contract for young people was an only one example. They are right: a sample is of our a management copy.

The University of New York d …

The University of New York dismantles the Booty payment to Waiter http://bit.ly/d3n97o

The negotiation of the impossible agreement

Juan Carlos Escudier

Except for the Government, which already has custom, he is a difficult optimistic being on the economic evolution when the statisticians of the unemployment remember every month that the INEM comes closer in number of inhabitants that of Madrid and his metropolitan area. The unemployment is a flagstone for Shoemaker, but also it it has begun being for the set of the political class, to which the citizenship demands some type of joint initiative for minim that should be. In that there are theoretically the political groups, to which the troika monclovita delivered on Monday his proposals of consensus that, like ten orders, can be summed up in two: to help to the construction and to imitate a luck of public banking so that the credits of the ICO come straight to the companies. Although late, there are two guessed right measurements.

More in Earth of nobody

The example of the management one

The management one proposed the day before yesterday a new slavery contract for young people, designed for the generation without without: without right to unemployment, without severance pay, without quotation to the Social security … without complexes, which for asking that I did not stay. To the moment they rectified, and said that it was “an only one example”. They are right. A perfect example is of our a management copy, the European leader in dismissals for points of fall of the GDP. In Spain we are stingy with the flattery, but the truths it is necessary to say them: our model businessmen are the envy of the world, the only ones in the whole planet that sacrifice themselves so much for the worker that, of average, they declare before Treasury Department less income than your own personnel. And what to say about his leader! Perhaps there is better example than don Gerardo Díaz Ferrari of the kindness, the virtues and the ways of the typical Spanish boss, of his best tradition?

It is true that generalizing is unjust, because there is of everything in the vineyard of the gentlemen; that here also we have many businessmen of the antiSpain, those unsupportive who think earlier about his workpeople that in our competitiveness, which raise the salary without worrying for the inflation, and they even give them a ham for Christmas. Fortunately for all, the representatives of our distinguished management one do not allow to take for these siren singings. What more it is they who would like! And that's why they speak about austerity, of the belt narrows, while don Gerardo does not pay to his personnel, but it has money for his Ferrari, his Rolls or his Porsche. The CEOE also tells that the dismissal is expensive, and to demonstrate it he dismissed it does not so much his General Secretary with a minimal indemnification: 1.9 million euros, nothing more. If it is necessary to give example, there is our management darling. That we arrange this between all (oé, oé).

A world the other way round

The Supreme Court accepts a new demand against Waiter … of: Francisco Correa!

----

A world the other way round? The comic Chris Rock already said it a few years ago: "The world is going crazy when the best rapper is white (Eminem), the best golfer is black (Woods), the tallest player of the NBA he is Chinese (Yao Ming), the Swiss gain the Cup America and Germany does not want to go to the war”.

Arnau the Catalan in the comments

To kill Waiter to bury the Gürtel

Do not try to explain it out. I have just returned from a long trip for the foreigner, and there it is not believed. In Spain, big and free, the only person who is in judicial predicaments through the fault of the pro-Franco dictatorship is the judge who tried to investigate his crimes. In Spain, clean and pure, the partridges shoot against the shotguns, and don Vito Correa happens from accused to accuser, with the blessing of the Supreme Court; the justice the other way round. In Spain, without sin conceived, already only there are missing against Waiter a complaint of Iñaki de Juana Chow, other one of Laureano Oubiña and the third one of the relatives of Pinochet. And better not to give ideas.

“It does not come to Holy Week”, they say to me from his environment, where every day they see it more difficult. None of the movements in the chess game against the judge is chance and there is hurry to give checkmate. It is necessary to give example between the magistracy. The next week, Wednesday, the 10th of March, the judges of the Top Court of Justice of Madrid will have to declare themselves on the listening of the Gürtel. It is a key sight for the strategists of the right, for Threshing machine and company, which openly the telephone pricks already play at annulling; to cover the septic well of the corruption of the PP with the trap-door of the defect of form.

It is a strategy of proven efficacy, it went out already well with the case Naseiro. And if it works again, the moral this time will be definitive. Aim at the new norms. In Spain, big and free, there are things that do not touch, and not only the Franco period is a taboo, also it it is the PP. In Spain, clean and pure, the justice is for the poor, and not only the political impunity exists, also the judicial one. In Spain, without sin conceived, the brave juececillos already know by what abide. I have just returned, and desire brings in me of leaving again.

Related: Is it possible to record a lawyer when he speaks with his client?//Waiter blames the PP and The World of a campaign in his against.

Cuartopoder is already in the Network …

Cuartopoder is already in the Network. A lot of luck, partners: http://www.cuartopoder.es.

Capes trio for Hope Aguirre

Hope Aguirre cuts two ears and the tail: front photo for the lideresa in ABC, in World and in Reason. The three with layer, and the best thing of everything: three different ones and in different places! Beauty, beauty and beauty!, that the bullfighting ones pleased with the countess would say and olé. I suppose that this is the difference between the Government of Madrid and that of Catalunya: while the Parlament takes several months debating on the possible prohibition of the bulls, with guests in the camera in favor and against the bullfights, in Madrid the president gets up a bullfighting morning and decides that the "holiday" is a good of cultural interest because I cost it. For decree law, which the one who pays bequest (and this also costs for the fronts).

Is it possible to record a lawyer when he speaks with his client?

Reading recommended to understand this supposed case of the listening to the lawyers of the Gürtel that has cost to the judge of the National Hearing the third complaint admitted to step into the Supreme Court: the resource of entreaty of the District attorney's office to the Supreme Court endorsing the judge Waiter (doc).

The plaintiffs - between them, proper Thong - denounce two types of conversations recorded between the accused and his defenders: the telephone pricks and the recordings when they spoke with them in the jail; a few tests that disabled persons consider and with those who try to annul the whole investigation for the door of behind of the form defect. This explains the District attorney's office on the phone tappings:

The professional secret that it protects to the relations of the lawyers with his clients, can, in exceptional circumstances, be interfered by judicial decisions that agree the telephone intervention of the devices installed in his professional offices. It is clear that the measurement covers an unquestionable gravity and has to be considered carefully by the judicial organ that agrees it, must limit itself to those assumptions in which a steadfastness exists, sufficiently confirmed, of that the lawyer could have exceeded his obligations and professional responsibilities integrating into the criminal activity, like one of his component elements.

In the case that occupies us, there has not taken place the telephone intervention of any professionals' phone of the legal profession. What has happened is that, across the interception of several suspects' phones, there are recorded conversations realized apparently with attorneys in charge of his legal advice. In this circumstance the professional secret cannot act with the same energy and steadfastness that takes place, when he is the client the one that comes to the office of the lawyer and in this moment, the interception of the conversation takes place, without cause or foundation that justifies it. The attorney who uses his phone to communicate with his clients who have it taken control, he cannot claim a privileged dealing that extends the secret to these ends. The evaluation of the content of the conversations will have to be used cautiously by the organ juzgador, but in no case it is possible to declare the nullity of his content.

For the exposed thing, all the motives that refer to the nullity of the phone tappings must be insignificant.

The juridical argumentation on why is it possible to listen with judicial order to a lawyer when he speaks with his client in a visit in the jail is slightly more extensive and, therefore, much more difficult to sum up. As the district attorney explains, there is a somewhat confused specific regulation for the administrative authorities - for the prison guards, so that it is understood - and generic other one for the judges, who yes can puncture the conversations between a lawyer and his defended one, although they are forced to justify it very well. I try an explanatory extract, although I recommend the finished reading of the document, which is not so long either and helps to understand very well the topic

Although the general diet of these interventions does not provoke any interpretive difficulty, the question has presented to itself, nevertheless, more polemic as for the intervention of the communications of the interns with his lawyers, since this measurement, in accordance with the art. 51.2 LOGP, it can only be adopted “by order of the judicial authority and in the terrorism assumptions”, what for his syntactic ambiguity it allows to extend or reduce the ambience of application of the prescript as the locution is understood formulated in alternative or accumulative terms.

In effect, the STC 183/1994 limits itself to declaring that “the art. 51.2 of the L.O.G.P. authorizes only the judicial authority to suspend or to take control, in a motivated and proportionate way, of the communications of the intern with his Lawyer without he authorizing in no case the Penitentiary Administration to interfere these communications”. What the Constitutional Court declares is that the possibility of taking control of the communications of an intern with his attorney cannot be left to itself in exclusive hands of the administrative authority by — the director of the center — but this measurement, for the entity of the affected right — the right of defense — it needs judicial previous authorization.

(…) clearer if it fits in this point turns out to be the ATS of December 10, 1999 (Door Luis), according to which, “the intervention of the communications agreed by the Director of a penitentiary center of the art. 51 of the LOGP does not keep any relation with the interventions that can remember under protection of the art. 579 of the LECr”.

(…) Of the exposed thing it is concluded that when the intervention of the communications of an intern has for purpose the investigation of a crime one will be able to come to the norm of the art. 579 LECr, without it proceeding to do distinction because of the recipient of the communication — pleaded or not — not of the nature of the crime — terrorism or not — since the art. 51.2 LOGP contemplated from the limited perspective of the penitentiary diet can arrange nothing — and it does not do it — against the penal procedural law enforcement. The Investigator will be able to agree the intervention of the communications in the investigation of any crime on the base of the art. 579 LECr with a proviso that in his resolution I expressed the judgment of suitability, need and proportionality of the measurement.

More abridged: it is possible to listen to a lawyer to speak with his defended one whenever a judge arranges it, and not only in cases of terrorism; it is not slightly strange that Waiter has not even been invented, but jurisprudence exists in abundance that it continues this criterion. It is easier to understand with an example, and there are cases to tens. The recent one: that of the investigation of the murder of Marta del Castillo. I quote again the resource of the district attorney:

Not less known by his sad actuality it is the case of the investigation continued by the murder and violation of young Marta del Castillo that 4 of Seville has given place to the D.P. nº 746/09 of the Court of first instance nº. The need to progress in the cause for, according to the literality of the resolution, “the clarification of the facts, level of the implication in them of the already imputed ones and, in his case, of third persons, and the find of the body of the minor” determined that the Instructor with base in the arranged in the 579.3rd art. LECr was agreeing for Edict of March 3, 2009 the “intervention, recording and listening of the communications that M.C.D, S.B.P and F.J.D.M. support in the Penitentiary Centers in which the same ones remain or remain imprisoned, so much phone companhies as of booth” (bold face in the original). Since in execution of the agreed thing the communications of the interns were recorded with his attorneys, the defense of the imputed one was of interest the nullity of this resolution for understanding compromised the defense right. The request was rejected by Edict of July 24, 2009, which he declares in this respect:“ … the car of March 3 Lawyer - client did not agree definitely the intervention or observation of the conversations however much they were recorded also as a result of not having being excluded and it is known that the content of these communications would not be usable against the culprits with his Lawyers except in the relevant thing to the find or location of the body of the victim”. Namely that in the intervention of the communications of the imputed one the Judge does not have why to exclude to limine those that this one supports with his lawyer, even though later it should reject those of this class that are not of interest to the concrete object of the investigation, in this case the find of the corpse. On the contrary, it is licit to contribute to the cause the recording of the communications of the imputed one with his lawyer if the same ones reveal where it is possible to locate the body of the victim, neither more nor less than the confession to the lawyer of the circumstances in which it got rid of corpus delicti — revelation at last not carried out — with the whole load incriminadora that it can bear. Something similar is what has happened in the present cause: they have intervened temporarily the communications of three imputed interns in a penitentiary center including to his lawyers like measurement directed especially to the investigation of the crime of money washing that those were planning and executing organizadamente from the prison.

And: why were the lawyers and his clients recording the conversations between? For the district attorney it is simple to explain: to investigate a crime that was taking place, precisely, during these conversations, in which Thong was giving instructions to his lawyers to move his money in the tax havens.

The intervention of the communications arranged by the resolutions that are appealed was a measurement objectively necessary for the investigation of the facts and provided to the gravity of these, it must be born in mind that the same one was directed especially to investigate the crime of money washing that, according to solid indications, the imputed ones kept on committing from the penitentiary establishment in which they were internal. Nothing to see, as one alleges, with the desire to discover the strategies of defense of the imputed ones, but with the obligation to investigate and to chase new acts of concealment and deviation of criminal effects placed out of the scope of the Spanish jurisdiction to the detriment of the arranged in the art. 503.2 LECr, which precisely justifies the provisional prison for the need to prevent the imputed ones from being able to commit new crimes.

Waiter blames the PP and The World of a campaign in his against

And it is right:

All the disciplinary and penal performances against me are framed in a concrete stage, on initiative of a series of persons interrelated between themselves and always with the support of the same supports mediáticos, that have done that, generally, it knows the resolutions for the news in them appeared, simultaneously that have moved forward performances, determined strategies and developed disparagement campaigns against my person.

This way, and from February, 2009, coinciding with the public knowledge of the investigation that the Central Court of Instruction nº 5 was taking against a series of persons linked in major or minor measurement to a political party, with implications in diverse autonomic, local and national public organisms, the public declarations of persons in charge of the above mentioned party happen in a clear strategy of disfavor, harassment and disapproval of my jurisdictional work, without precedents in the Spanish judicial history, which has taken us to the place where now we are. A campaign encouraged by persons to whom I imputed and cheered by interested mass media, for ideological and personal motives, in ending with my career and professional prestige.

It is not necessary to summon to the imagination, to allow to go for conspiratorial theories, so of the taste of others, to appreciate that these initiatives against me shape a coincidental strategy, which happens for forcing in this head office the suspension in my functions. A strategy initiated in February, 2009 when – to instances of the Attorney General's office and in the exercise of my jurisdictional functions – I agreed the prison of the principal ones involved in the Previous Procedure nº 275/08, opened by crimes of money washing, falsities, briberies, tax evasion, unlawful assembly and traffic of influences.

It was not necessary to wait very much so that political personalities next to those who supposedly benefited from the supposed criminal practices should begin a cruel campaign against me. Already on February 16, 2009, only a few days after the first detentions, the means were gathering declarations of D. Federico Trillo, Delegated to the Congress and the ex-Minister, saying that I was “acting with clear injustice, with clear illegality” and of acting “against the law and the jurisprudence” (I document nº 1); in the same line, representatives [present or past] of two autonomic governments in whose bosom criminal indications would be warned continued the same footpath denigratoria: in a confused phrase, but with clear pejorative tone, Dª Esperanza Aguirre declared that “Waiter, if it can, does a suit to me; we are going to try to prevent from happening” (I document nº 2). From his part, much more serious were, to my judgment, the declarations of D. Fernando de Rosa Torner, ancient counsellor of Justice in the Government of D. Francisco Camps – later imputed – and current Vice-president of the Judicial Power, who in public declarations warned that my work as instructor “was damaging the image of the justice” and which might “spend a red line that is very important, that is the corruption”, without wasting the occasion to go out in defense of his ancient chief, of whom he said that it was “absolutely honorable” (I document nº 3).

These declarations were aired properly and they spurred by certain related mass media ideologically to the imputed ones and with certain experience in campaigns denigratorias, in particular against me. It is necessary to remember that – for the alone fact of having questioned an expert report that was suggesting amazed ETA links with the offense of March 11, 2004 – I was an object of a pursuit mediática without precedents [although yes with aftermath] for the newspaper THE WORLD, whose Director D. Pedro José Ramírez Codina, was condemned for the Court of the First Instance nº 3 of Pozuelo de Alarcón, in Judgment of May 29, 2007, for having committed an outrage against my honor. Later, the Section Vigésimoprimera of the Provincial Hearing of Madrid, in Judgment of May 29, 2007, he came to confirm the condemnation of D. Pedro José Ramírez who, since then, does not allow to spend any opportunity to look for my disparagement from the resentment, without respecting either the truth or the reality of the facts.

(…) those who now correct me of partisan were coming undone in praises towards me in the past; apparently, then how now, were they looking only for his political advantage. According to this one, they do not hesitate now to denigrate any to whom not between in his particular interests. When this is done against a judge it results from an unusual gravity and supposes a serious contempt towards the jurisdictional function.

Because, and I must repeat this, the target of all this harassment, certainly, is not so much the question of my person but the question of my jurisdictional work, trying to put in judgment cloth the regularity of the instructions and, with it, force the impunity of the criminal conducts that the Court dared to investigate, either be crimes in the crimes frame against the humanity committed during the Franco period, either be a plot of corruption related to persons in charge of a political party, either be the instruction for supposed filtrations of an operation against ETA.

Baltasar Garzón. Much more in the writing of allegations that it has presented today before the General Council of the Judicial Power (doc); a text that, to change, not only is left but it is necessary to read.

Waiter also rejects to three vowels of the Judicial Power: to Fernando de Rosa, ex-adviser of Justice of Camps (yes, it is in the CGPJ); to Margarita Robles, the ex-secretary of the State of Felipe's Interior in the times of when Roldán was escaping to Laos and Waiter was investigating the GAL (yes, also it is in the CGPJ); and to Gem Galician, the jueza of the boric acid that also is in the CGPJ for major glory of the governmental body of the Spanish justice. Attentive to the exhibition of Waiter on the jueza of the boric one:

Dª Gem Galician Suárez was the holder of the Court of first instance nº 35 of Madrid, to which there corresponded the instruction of the supposed falsification of an expert report that – with the most notable absence of consistency – was trying to link the possession of boric acid in power of the involved one in the offenses of March 11, 2004 with previous apprehensions of this substance to ETA members.

In the exercise of my jurisdiction and by request of the Attorney General's office, I investigated the fact in the summary 9/2003 and, in the course of the same one, I imputed the experts who, of form so acrítica and irrational, had feigned this [nonexistent] link, but Galician Dª Gema revirtió the situation to acquit to those and to impute without motive, on the contrary, Commissioner general of Scientific Police and other professionals of the Police who had rejected, for insolvent, that supposed link [link with which one was still trying to torpedo, then and today, the instruction of the biggest offense suffered in Spain, under protection of rough conspiratorial theories that still today there protect those who also proclaim the "need" for my suspension].

Since it is public and well-known, in July, 2008 the Provincial Hearing of Madrid absolved four members of the Police imputed by Galician Dª Gema. This one was helped up two months later to the General Council of the Judicial Power at the proposal of the People's Party.

Since then – and possibly feeling deprived of authority by the Hearing – this Vowel has been characterized, like member of the Disciplinary Commission, by a constant pursuit of my person up to a slightly reasonable point and that shows, as in the previous case, a void disposition to face of objective and serene form the study of my personal situation. I can remember (1) that when the Disciplinary Commission agreed to push back the complaint interposed by Generalitat Valenciana against me [precisely for having instructed the Previous Procedure nº 275/2008, from that the imputation stemmed to his President] Galician Dª Gema remained alone to oppose the file and to request that the performances were sent to the Service of Examination; as it seems, this Vowel would have written a Particular Vote hinting that I would have the habit of intervening in causes which instruction does not correspond to me. I cannot but remain with the content of the news about press (documents nº 8 to 10) but if really the Vote suggests such a thing, I must do reservation of the opportune actions and request the abstention of the one who assumes such prejudices against me. It is known also to this Advice (2) that when this Disciplinary Commission imposed in June, 2009 a sanction for three hundred euros on me for light absence, with two affirmative votes even of the file, this Vowel was taken down proposing against me an excessive sanction for very serious absence. Of equal form (3) when ubiquitous D. Antonio Panea and D. José Luis Mazón proposed that I to be sanctioned for having asked for a permission to go to Peru, the Commission agreed the file of similar denunciation, bereft of any sense, although with the vote against the Vowel Galician Dª Gema. In any case, I send myself to the files of the Disciplinary Commission, which the Plenary meeting will be able to obtain under protection of the art. 29.3 L.P.A.

I can only understand this clear absence of objectivity in the blood feud that would profess me this Vowel, immediately after that penal instruction where he chose to turn to my instructing work, she turns out to be finally unauthorized herself for a forceful Judgment of the Provincial Hearing. But be which there will be his motives, it is the true thing that in his daily work in the Disciplinary Commission this Vowel has not showed an aptitude to value in a reasonable, sensible and impartial way the questions that affect me, therefore I request that it abstains in the decision on my situation.

The PP goes mad: “estoloarr …

The PP goes mad: the "estoloarreglamosentretodos" is a conspiracy to save Shoemaker (!!!) http://bit.ly/9i8FPg

Hypocrisy and chastity

Big Wyoming

The appearance of the children of Marcial Maciel, founder of Christ's Legionaries, denouncing that were violated by their own father joins in the long run list of atrocities committed by this monster, and it is the consequence of a politics of systematical concealment on the part of the ecclesiastic authorities and of the dome of the sect that they inhabit in the hypocrisy and the lie.
It is surprised that, in spite of the great thing that has been written on this master who has been on the point of being canonized, he has never suffered the consequences of his misconducts – that seem extracted of a terror novel – and also that his image is venerated in schools and centers of the sect without the minor gesture having been seen on the part of his coreligionists to apologize to the society, not for his atrocities, but for his complicity on having denied the facts.
Since they show or have shown public positions of big responsibility, it would not be bad either that Ann Botella or the ex-ministers Michavila and Acebes, which are a moral reference and endorse with his presence the integrity of the acts of this sect, were apologizing for if some child should take in his pocket a religious print of this rapist pederast.

More in Matters and questions

The anti-abortion ones go at least

The company of assistants' inventory Lynce has taken into account 9.726 persons, reports EFE. In the previous anti-abortion march of October 17, 2009 he coded the participation in 55.316 persons. The organization has made sure that today they were 600.000 persons. In that of October he said two millions.

More

The "Bolshevik" abortion

In the penultimate declaration of the century against the abortion, half a year ago, the company Lynce – that adds the number of assistants one to one by means of air photos – counted 55.316 demonstrators. The organizers said two million, thirty times more. Yesterday, again in the street, Lynce took into account 9.726 demonstrators against the abortion. The organizers, after consulting with his crystal ball, presumed of 600.000, sixty times more. Of these interesting numbers two information is deduced: that the protests against the new law of the abortion go at least, and that the imagination and the demagogy of the anti-abortion ones go to more. To very much more.

“The abortion is part of the old recipes of the totalitarismos that have destroyed Europe”, said yesterday Jaime Mayor Oreja, while it was crying like demonstrator what he could not defend like the minister. It is “something of Bolsheviks”, insisted on the self-criticism the vice-president of the parliamentary group of the European PP, who should explain these things to his associates in Brussels. To the CDU of Angela Merkel, who supports in the communist Germany a law of period almost identical to the Spaniard. Or to Sarkozy, this Bolshevik acquaintance who allows in France the period to be, in some assumptions, wider than in the red Spain.

Our new law is so "totalitarian" that we will not be already the clinical abortionist of Europe. The abortion will be free during the first 14 weeks, without need that the woman has to lie to a psychiatrist; but it will be more restricted than with the old law, where it was possible to abort even with 8 months. Yesterday the PP, which prefers the hypocritical abortion, announced that it will appeal the reform before the third camera, before the Constitutional Court. Also it promised that they will repeal it when they govern. The same as Raspberry with the law of the divorce.

Partial genre

An ironic poem to celebrate the day of the woman.

Estrogen is the feminine hormone.
Thanks to her
the women are more comprehensive
and they do not go to the war because they are
candid souls
angels of the hearth
they do not say so many blocks
as the man
they do not shout for the street
they are submissive
and they accept the destination that comes to them
good what is the estrogen
that does that the women do not get angry
when the boss cuts them away
the payroll
good what is the estrogen
since thanks to him
or to her
I do not even know already
the women are chaste and polite
much more than the men
and they neither compete nor touch him the sex
for the street
if we except skylight to those
that endure testosterone excess and almost
they become so free as men
to insult or to play football
because it is known that true you sew
they are not learned that not gentleman you are wrong
since all these things remain
in the blood glasses of the brain
and they are so unchangeable as the sun
and what are we going to do if there are prescripts
tyrannical, precise and biological
that did to the estrogen to image of his owner
so that it was for the centuries of the centuries
amen lightly for below
of the testosterone.

Ann Tapia. The naked stowaway – The Crow's sailor Editions.

Thank you, Moon

There resigns the director of the museum of Valencia to which there censured the photos of the Gürtel//The images that the PP wants to hide

The Supreme one denies to Waiter the tests of his defense

The judge Luciano Varela, the instructor of the Supreme Court in the cause of corruption for the pits of the Franco period, has just communicated to Baltasar Garzón who pushes back the tests that it had requested in his defense. The accused had asked declaration to take to three magistrates of the National Hearing that endorsed his competition; to the district attorneys Carlos Jiménez Villarejo and Javier Zaragoza; to the lawyers of the victims of the Franco period; and to several excellent international lawyers so that they were saying if the amnesty laws had validity in a country like Spain. Varela, after one month without answering, refuses to arrange these tests in a confused car (TIF) where he argues that the Supreme one has still to decide on the appeal resource that Waiter presented against the cause.

The answer is difficult to interpret, because it can mean two things. The first one, that tests do not need any more because, of the resource to be estimated, already they would not be necessary. The second one, something more worrying for Waiter, that if his resource is rejected and the investigation goes for forward, Varela is going to finish the instruction and spend the ball to the court, therefore tests would not need any more.

And if I was a Waiter, I would put myself in the worst thing.

-----

Another good news. From today, Spanish Phalange, which either his deposit has deposited, either can act like accusation against Waiter, with the guarantee of the Supreme one. If Franco was waking up, it would be very proud of the Spain that we have constructed. Today it is a big day for the democracy.